Interpersonal Communication
- Cultural Values
For Speech 100
(Fundamentals of Oral Communication) Return to:
Syllabus
Daily Schedule
Worksheets
For Speech 210 (Interpersonal
Communication) return to: Syllabus
Daily Schedule
|
Cultural Values |
Description |
Examples |
Leadership Preference |
Discussion Process |
|
High Uncertainty Avoidance |
· need for extensive rules and regulations · a desire for consensus about goals · a desire for certainty and security · reluctant to take risks and concerned about the future |
· Greece · Japan · Peru · Mexico · Turkey · Portugal |
· Autocratic · accept seniority as the basis for leadership · making and enforcing rules reduces uncertainty |
· uncomfortable with ambiguous tasks · prefer organized and systematic discussion formals · more likely to compromise when disagreements arise · intolerant of deviant people or ideas |
|
High Task Orientation/ Achievement |
· focus heavily on getting the job done · training and individual achievement valued when it gets the job done. |
· Japan · Austria · Germany · Switzerland · Italy · Mexico
|
· Autocratic males · Objectivity, assertiveness, discipline and control valued |
· male virtues include assertiveness, independence and individuality · men are less conforming than women · women are not encouraged in male virtues and not expected to take part in decision making groups |
|
High Social Orientation/ Nurturing |
· concerned about the feelings of members and their smooth functioning as a team · people are at least if not more important then task or material achievement · equality between the sexes |
· Sweden · Norway · Denmark · Chile · Portugal · Thailand |
· Democratic · Good interpersonal skills and openness valued · Task skills required of leadership regardless of sex |
·promote a friendly atmosphere ·conformity maintains the group environment ·values cooperative problem solving and a friendly atmosphere
|
|
High Context |
· relies heavily on subtle, often nonverbal cues to maintain social harmony · determine meaning based on the context and history of the relationship · harmony is maintained by using indirect expression of opinions |
· Japan · Korea · Arab · Puerto Rico |
|
· refrain from saying no · talk around a point and allow the other person to fill in the missing pieces · express opinions indirectly · ambiguity and use of silence are admired |
|
Low Context |
· use language primarily to express thought feelings and ideas as clearly and logically as possible · the meaning is in the message i.e. the words used · silence may be interpreted as a lack of interest, unwillingness to communicate, hostility, anxiety, shyness or a sign of interpersonal incompatibility. |
· USA · Canada · Israel |
· verbal fluency is admired |
· state opinions and desires directly · strive to persuade others · clear eloquent speech is praised
|
|
Lustig, Myron and Laura Cassota. “Comparing Group Communication Across Cultures: Leadership Conformity, and Discussion Process.” Small Group Communication: A Reader. 6 ed. Ed. Robert Cathcart and Larry Samovar. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers, 1992. |
||||
|
Adler, Rodman, Rosenfeld, Towne, and Proctor. Understanding Human Communication. 7th Ed. and Culture and Communication from Interplay. 7th Ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers, 2000. |
||||
|
Cultural Values |
Description |
Examples |
Leadership Preference |
Discussion Process |
|
Individualistic |
· view their primary responsibility is to take care of self and immediate family · characterized by self reliance, competition, independence and privacy · values autonomy, change, youth, individual security and equality · may have many flexible group memberships based on shared interests and activities |
· USA · Australia · Great Britain · Canada |
· Democratic · will respect the legitimate exercise of power |
· rewards talkative members and superstars · norm of speaking out directly · individual achievement and initiative encouragement · individual blame assigned · tolerant of conflict and use a direct solution-oriented approach |
|
Collectivistic |
· feel loyalties and obligations to an in-group: one’s extended family, community, or company · expect their groups to take care of them and in exchange they feel absolute loyalty to the group · belong to a few permanent groups · take care of extended family before self · high value on duty, order, tradition, age, status and hierarchy · concern for getting along in the group |
· Venezuela · Taiwan · Mexico · Philippines
|
· Autocratic · promotes traditional points of view |
· more attentive and concerned with the opinions of significant group members, but may favor those who don’t dominate the discussion · team players—credit and blame shared · more likely to discuss until agreement is reached · the need to conform may make members reluctant to speak out even when it might be in the interests of the group |
|
Power Distance: the degree to which members of a society accept an unequal distribution of power. |
||||
|
Low Power Distance |
· minimize social or class inequalities—they may still exist but one person is considered as good as another · reduce hierarchical organizational structures
|
· Israel · New Zealand · Germany · USA · Austria · Denmark |
· Democratic · use power only for legitimate purposes · respect for leadership is earned · value cooperative work and power distribution |
· less powerful encouraged to participate · challenging authority is acceptable and even desirable · it’s okay to question the status quo · may feel unappreciated if they aren’t consulted about decisions |
|
High Power Distance |
· social hierarchies and inequality are accepted—some people are entitled to greater power or privilege · each person has a rightful and protected place · maintaining the hierarchy is maintaining your place |
· Philippines · Mexico · India · France · Venezuela |
· Autocratic · paternalistic, persuasive, directive · the reason for exercising power is irrelevant · inability to be directive may be seen as incompetent |
· solicits opinions from high status members · defers to high status members without question · respect authority · expect the person in charge to know what they are doing and to make decisions |
|
Low Uncertainty Avoidance |
· accept risk, uncertainty and change · believes in a reduction of rules · a tolerance for deviation from expected behaviors |
· Singapore · India · Philippines · Denmark · USA · Ireland |
· Democratic |
· Willing to break rules for pragmatic reasons · Accept conflict as natural but are willing to compromise · Tolerant of tension and ambiguity that goes with change |