MINUTES ;
Faculty Senate December 3, 2003
Present:
President: Phil
Droke
Vice President:
Glen Avantaggio
Alicja Baker
John Lindsay
Rod Fowers
Gwen Spencer
Patricia Haggerty
Ruth Frickle
Ron Sabado
Katie Gulliford
Rebecca Sliger
Jeff Wagnitz
Becky Riverman
1. Registration
Issues: Becky Riverman was a t the Senate meeting because the Psychology
Dept. had issues concerning registration. Rod Fowers asked how did students
get into classes when they did not have the proper prerequisites. Who gave
them entry codes? When students withdraw on the web, there is no paperwork.
Rod then gave examples of two students registered for Winter quarter who did
not meet prerequisites. Becky asked that she be emailed with these types of
problems so she can investigate and correct issues of this type. Phil Droke
asked if there was a way to fix this process so it did not break down. Gwen
Spencer added that the sheer numbers of students with problems relating to
advising and entry code issues grows. Becky Riverman mentioned that once an
entry code is sued, it can't be used again. Also, the present computer
program comes from CIS and can not be revised easily. Rebecca Sliger added
that students should be directed more and more to register via the web. Also
discussed was student overloads in classes. Rebecca asked if faculty could be
given special stamps for use. John Lindsay also mentioned the issue of
secured forms. Alicja Baker emphasized that an entry code could work to
prevent students from abusing our systems and classes with students who
overload the class, ie, a class opened to 31 students and in fact ends up with
40 students. Becky Riverman said that some departments have students register
but do not have prerequisites so that entry codes can be assigned to students.
2. CiIS
Issues. CIS issues are slow to be remedied via software. Rebecca Sliger stated
that we are trying to work a problem that we have no control over. Jeff
Wagnitz said CIS is refusing to do more right now as this system will not last
for more than 2 years. Phil Droke emphasized that the State is moving more
toward amalgamation of these systems. Gwen Spencer stated that Highline
has more prerequisites required for classes. more so than any other Community
College in the State. Rebecca responded that prerequisites are well worth
the effort.
3. Waiting
List. Becky Riverman pointed out that we have shifted from a touch tone
system to another one, at Highline. When classes are registered for on the
web, the computer will tell students that the class is full and ask if the
student wants to be wait-listed. Faculty must decide the cut-off point for
students, ie, the number that will be on the wait list. Also, volunteers are
wanted to test a new system for registration. Spring quarter, a few divisions
will participate in testing this new schema. Most community colleges are
using wait lists and like it. Also, the wait lists check for all pre
requisites, a good added feature. Rod Fowers asked approximately what
percentage of students are using the web site. The response was, about 60%.
Katie Gulliford also emphasized that there are several types of wt. lists.
There are different methods for dealing with this issue rather than dropping
students. Faculty senate members will have more information on this topic
before the 1-27-04 faculty meeting. So, members will have time to gather
data, put information together for the January meeting of the committee.
Ruth Frickle,
Rebecca Sliger and Katie Gulliford were thanked by President, Phil Droke for
doing an excellent job.
Respectfully
submitted,
Judy
Johnson-Wise,
Faculty
Secretary